Welcome to cyber4all.com, Wednesday, 7 January 2009


 Awards Home
 Who are we?
 Criteria
 Awards
 Winners
 Submit your site
 Contact us

Top 5 categories:
Name: Hits:
Shareware
235638
Home
189673
D2Mac
183493
Awards
125129
3Dfxstuff
63190

Shareware downloads:
Name: Hits:
WinACE 2.2
1998
WinZip 8.1
1937
ICQ v.2003a
604

3Dfx downloads:
Name: Hits:
Voodoo2 Driver
11404
Nvidia 2000/XP 44..
10862
DirectX 9.0a
10270
Voodoo3 2000/3000..
8124
Orchid Righteous ..
7544



Criteria:
There are different requirements for each award. The Gold Award is the most prestigious award, and is therefore also very hard to get.
The below criteria MUST be read before you submit your site for evaluation.

§1 - Sites that will not be considered for nomination
§1.1
Sites that contain one or more of the following:
  - Adult material
  - Racism
  - Sexim
  - Illegal activities
  - Copyrighted material
  - Other material that may be deemed offensive. We reserve the
    right to decide, which material is deemed offensive.
    You will respect this.
  - Sites may not steal bandwidth from other sites.

§2 - Criteria for evaluation
§2.1
We are looking for sites that have new, creative and innovative designs. This may be in the form of a completely new layout or an old layout used in a very creative new way.
§2.2
How well does the layout support the theme?
It is very important, that the layout supports the theme and content of the site. Also, it is important that the site is easily navigated, and that it is easy for visitors to read the content.
Should a member of the jury want to have his or her own site evaluated, that member will not be allowed to vote in that particular nomination.

§3 - The jury process
§3.1
The site will be reviewed by a number of judges, all of them who are in the Award Jury.
When reviewed, the judges will use the Voting System to cast his/her votes, which will then be sent to the CotB.

The members of the jury all have thorough knowledge of the Internet, and most are familiar about creating homepages.
All judges are critical, professional, and fair - they have been instructed to be - and will not let lack of interest in a certain subject influence their decision.
§3.2
Your site can be nominated in two different ways. First (and primarily), you can submit your own site, and the members of the jury will then review the site. Secondly, a member of the jury can nominate a site that he or she finds interesting, and then submit the URL of that site to the CotB, whereafter the jury will review and vote as usual.
§3.3
Once your have submitted a site, the CotB will review the site, making sure that the site does not break one or more of the basic rules (§1)
§3.4
The members of the jury are not allowed to discuss site nominations with anyone not a member of the jury. Furthermore, they are not allowed to discuss nominated sites with people who are not members of the jury. Also, they are not permitted to attempt to sway votes.
§3.5
The CotB, at his or her sole discretion, may award a Bronze Award to a site having an average grade of at least 3.
§3.6
The chairman, at his or her sole discretion, may block the nomination of any site at any time in the process.
§3.7
Any change to the paragraphs described herein must pass a 2/3 majority vote in the jury.

§4 - Things that might increase your chances
§4.1
The site should be "Best experienced with any browser", and should not be too heavy (it shouldn't take more than 30 seconds to fully download (56k modem)).
Jury members like organized designs that are easily navigated. Furthermore, broken links and images will give your site a lower grade in that category.
Most members dislikes pop-up windows, though pop-ups provided by your hosting provider (such as GroCities, Tripod, etc.) will be tolerated, and will not be counted as a pop-up window. The same goes for ads provided by your hosting provider (such as Xoom, who place an ad in the top of your site).

§5 - Refusal
§5.1
Eventhough we did not award your site, it doesn't mean that you cannot re-submit it when you have made changes to either layout or content.
We want to keep the Awards prestigious, and we are therefore constrained to be critical when reviewing sites, and we will turn down the majority of the submitted applications. Furthermore, we cannot reply to all applications. If you did not receive a reply, it means that your site has not been awarded, obviously.
You will respect our choice for refusal, and we can under no circumstances be held liable due to our choice.

§6 - Jury Rules
§6.1
The jury is restricted to a maximum of 8 persons. Currently, there are 3. The maximum number of members will be reviewed by the board in the future.
§6.2
Members are permanent or until they choose to resign or are removed from the jury by a 2/3 majority of the other jury members.
§6.3
A vacant jury seat is filled when a new member is nominated by the CotB and is confirmed at an election amongst the lasting members. All lasting members must vote 'Yay', before the seat can be filled by the nominated person.
§6.4
The CotB must be a current member of the jury, and must be confirmed by a 2/3 majority.
§6.5
The CotB term is permanent, or until he or she choose to resign, or is removed by a 2/3 majority by the other jury members.
§6.6
All members must vote on every issue within the specified timeframe.
§6.7
Should a member of the jury be unable to vote on an issue, he or she must name a proxy.
§6.8
Should a member of the jury be unable to vote on an issue, and he or she fails to name a proxy also, the current CotB will vote in his or her place.
§6.9
Members of the jurywill not discuss current or prospective nominations with anyone outside the jury.
§6.10
Members of the jury will not attempt to sway votes.
§6.11
Should a member of the jury want to have his or her own site evaluated, that member will not be allowed to vote in that particular nomination.
§6.12
Any changes to the criteria and to the Jury Rules must pass a 2/3 majority.


- The Jury




Copyright ©1998-2009 Cyber4All International.